Crash
On The Field
Posts: 1,645
|
Post by Crash on Aug 31, 2022 17:41:15 GMT -5
Seems this graphic is the flavour of the day. While the Offence and specifically Dane Evans' turnovers are well noted... It would appear many from the peanut gallery are struggling with the definition of "Difference" The Tiger Cats are dead last in turnovers forced. Really hard to blame that one on the QB. Stein went all in on D and it hasn't held up its end of the bargain either. It takes a team effort to be this bad. If you remove all of Danes turnovers the Cats would move all the way up to 8th. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by onemoredork on Aug 31, 2022 21:03:48 GMT -5
If there were a stat for dropped INTs by defense I'd bet we lead the league easily.
|
|
Crash
On The Field
Posts: 1,645
|
Post by Crash on Aug 31, 2022 21:15:37 GMT -5
If there were a stat for dropped INTs by defense I'd bet we lead the league easily. and dropped passes by RBs/Recs for INTs? |
|
|
|
Post by countfloyd1 on Sept 1, 2022 4:32:53 GMT -5
If there were a stat for dropped INTs by defense I'd bet we lead the league easily. and dropped passes by RBs/Recs for INTs? Agreed. Although this has dropped off after the first couple of games. The receivers tipping balls into opposition defence's hands, I mean. I'd be interested in a stat showing catches that "should" have been made that weren't. That seems to be our receiving corps' new M.O. Hard to believe some people don't think our receivers are a liability. |
|
Crash
On The Field
Posts: 1,645
|
Post by Crash on Sept 1, 2022 5:47:01 GMT -5
and dropped passes by RBs/Recs for INTs? Agreed. Although this has dropped off after the first couple of games. The receivers tipping balls into opposition defence's hands, I mean. I'd be interested in a stat showing catches that "should" have been made that weren't. That seems to be our receiving corps' new M.O. Hard to believe some people don't think our receivers are a liability. doesn't fit the narrative of "maybe we should have kept Masoli", it also implies you've actually watched the games, other teams and the league in general. When your entire online presence revolves around questioning others right to ask questions, not picking a side and simply hinting things are not good enough but not wanting to put yourself out there, it's easy to stay at 30,000 feet and say things like "feels like some changes may be needed" or "organisational culture" without actually naming the HC/President. It lacks any credibility. At a bare minimum there's 4 INTs and 3 fumbles that were flat out not Danes fault (Calgary late whistle and his own lineman booting the ball out of his hands) but again, that doesn't fit the "why didn't we go after Vernon Adams" narrative, like he's a protector of the football. |
|
